History
Total running cost: $0.5422
Prompt | Rows | Type | Model | Target | Status | Runtime | Run | By | Tokens | Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Run | Judge the following image on a few different criteria. Be very critical. We are aiming for perfection.
Each of judgements should be one of three values:
* "bad" if the image does not match the criteria
* "okay" if the image has elements of the criteria, but is not good yes
* "good" if the image matches the criteria, but could be better
* "perfect" if there is nothing that could be improved about the image
Return the judgements in xml format. The xml should contain with the following field names and should be graded on the following criteria:
<character></character> Is the character a 3D Pixar-style white furry ox?
<task></task> Is the character performing the task described?
<objects></objects> Are all the necessary objects in the scene? Is there anything wrong with them? Do they look realistic?
<expression></expression> Is the character's expression wide open and happy, with a visible spark of joy or engagement, conveying satisfaction in the activity?
<texture></texture> The fur must show clear texture and depth, with soft lighting that avoids harsh shadows or bright highlights.
<coloring></coloring> The fur must not contain any yellow or sepia tones (e.g., check that RGB values of white areas are near (255, 255, 255)).
<background></background> The entire background must be pure white (#FFFFFF) with no visible gradient, vignette, or objects other than the ox, gears, and workbench.
An example response looks like this:
<reasoning>Your reasoning</reasoning>
<character>good</character>
<task>bad</task>
<objects>bad</objects>
<expression>perfect</expression>
<texture>perfect</texture>
<coloring>good</coloring>
<background>perfect</background>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 50 | image → text | 12a062cde9ab46dfd404c2f4248d4046 | completed | 00:08:31 | 2 months ago | ox | 63003 tokens | $ 0.4475 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different criteria. Be very critical. We are aiming for perfection.
Each of judgements should be one of three values:
* "bad" if the image does not match the criteria
* "okay" if the image has elements of the criteria, but is not good yes
* "good" if the image matches the criteria, but could be better
* "perfect" if there is nothing that could be improved about the image
Return the judgements in xml format. The xml should contain with the following field names and should be graded on the following criteria:
<character></character> Is the character a 3D Pixar-style white furry ox?
<task></task> Is the character performing the task described?
<objects></objects> Are all the necessary objects in the scene? Is there anything wrong with them? Do they look realistic?
<expression></expression> Is the character's expression wide open and happy, with a visible spark of joy or engagement, conveying satisfaction in the activity?
<texture></texture> The fur must show clear texture and depth, with soft lighting that avoids harsh shadows or bright highlights.
<coloring></coloring> The fur must not contain any yellow or sepia tones (e.g., check that RGB values of white areas are near (255, 255, 255)).
<background></background> The entire background must be pure white (#FFFFFF) with no visible gradient, vignette, or objects other than the ox, gears, and workbench.
An example response looks like this:
<reasoning>Your reasoning</reasoning>
<character>good</character>
<task>bad</task>
<objects>bad</objects>
<expression>perfect</expression>
<texture>perfect</texture>
<coloring>good</coloring>
<background>perfect</background>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:46 | 2 months ago | ox | 6336 tokens | $ 0.0453 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different criteria. Be very critical. We are aiming for perfection.
Each of judgements should be one of three values:
* "bad" if the image does not match the criteria
* "okay" if the image has elements of the criteria, but is not good yes
* "good" if the image matches the criteria, but could be better
* "perfect" if there is nothing that could be improved about the image
Return the judgements in xml format. The xml should contain with the following field names and should be graded on the following criteria:
<character></character> Is the character a 3D Pixar-style white furry ox?
<task></task> Is the character performing the task described?
<objects></objects> Are all the necessary objects in the scene? Is there anything wrong with them? Do they look realistic?
<expression></expression> Is the character's expression wide open and happy, with a visible spark of joy or engagement, conveying satisfaction in the activity?
<texture></texture> The fur must show clear texture and depth, with soft lighting that avoids harsh shadows or bright highlights.
<coloring></coloring> The fur must not contain any yellow or sepia tones (e.g., check that RGB values of white areas are near (255, 255, 255)).
<background></background> The entire background must be pure white (#FFFFFF) with no visible gradient, vignette, or objects other than the ox, gears, and workbench.
An example response looks like this:
<reasoning>Your reasoning</reasoning>
<character>good</character>
<task>bad</task>
<objects>bad</objects>
<expression>perfect</expression>
<texture>perfect</texture>
<coloring>good</coloring>
<background>perfect</background>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:40 | 2 months ago | ox | 4401 tokens | $ 0.0185 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different criteria. Be very critical. We are aiming for perfection.
Each of judgements should be one of three values:
* "bad" if the image does not match the description
* "good" if the image matches the criteria, but could be better
* "perfect" if there is nothing that could be improved about the image
Return the judgements in xml format. The xml should contain with the following field names and should be graded on the following:
<character></character> Is the character a 3D Pixar-style white furry ox?
<task></task> Is the character performing the task described?
<objects></objects> Are all the necessary objects in the scene? Is there anything wrong with them? Do they look realistic?
<expression></expression> Is the character's expression wide open and happy, with a visible spark of joy or engagement, conveying satisfaction in the activity?
<texture></texture> The fur must show clear texture and depth, with soft lighting that avoids harsh shadows or bright highlights.
<coloring></coloring> The fur must not contain any yellow or sepia tones (e.g., check that RGB values of white areas are near (255, 255, 255)).
<background></background> The entire background must be pure white (#FFFFFF) with no visible gradient, vignette, or objects other than the ox, gears, and workbench.
An example response looks like this:
<reasoning>Your reasoning</reasoning>
<character>good</character>
<task>bad</task>
<objects>bad</objects>
<expression>perfect</expression>
<texture>perfect</texture>
<coloring>good</coloring>
<background>perfect</background>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:39 | 2 months ago | ox | 4340 tokens | $ 0.0186 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different criteria. Be very critical. We are aiming for perfection.
Each of judgements should be one of three values:
* "bad" if the image does not match the description
* "good" if the image matches the criteria, but could be better
* "perfect" if there is nothing that could be improved about the image
Return the judgements in xml format. The xml should contain with the following field names and should be graded on the following:
<character></character> Is the character a 3D Pixar-style white furry ox?
<task></task> Is the character performing the task described?
<objects></objects> Are all the necessary objects in the scene? Is there anything wrong with them? Do they look realistic?
<expression></expression> Is the character's expression wide open and happy, with a visible spark of joy or engagement, conveying satisfaction in the activity?
<texture></texture> The fur must show clear texture and depth, with soft lighting that avoids harsh shadows or bright highlights.
<coloring></coloring> The fur must not contain any yellow or sepia tones (e.g., check that RGB values of white areas are near (255, 255, 255)).
<background></background> The entire background must be pure white (#FFFFFF) with no visible gradient, vignette, or objects other than the ox, gears, and workbench.
An example response looks like this:
<reasoning>Your reasoning</reasoning>
<character>good</character>
<task>bad</task>
<objects>bad</objects>
<expression>perfect</expression>
<texture>perfect</texture>
<coloring>good</coloring>
<background>perfect</background>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:09 | 2 months ago | ox | 0 tokens | $ 0.0000 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different criteria. Be very critical. We are aiming for perfection.
Each of judgements should be one of three values:
* "bad" if the image does not match the description
* "good" if the image matches the criteria, but could be better
* "perfect" if there is nothing that could be improved about the image
Return the judgements in xml format. The xml should contain with the following field names and should be graded on the following:
<character></character> Is the character a 3D Pixar-style white furry ox?
<task></task> Is the character performing the task described?
<objects></objects> Are all the necessary objects in the scene?
<expression></expression> Is the character's expression wide open and happy, with a visible spark of joy or engagement, conveying satisfaction in the activity?
<texture></texture> The fur must show clear texture and depth, with soft lighting that avoids harsh shadows or bright highlights.
<coloring></coloring> The fur must not contain any yellow or sepia tones (e.g., check that RGB values of white areas are near (255, 255, 255)).
<background></background> The entire background must be pure white (#FFFFFF) with no visible gradient, vignette, or objects other than the ox, gears, and workbench.
An example response looks like this:
<reasoning>Your reasoning</reasoning>
<character>good</character>
<task>bad</task>
<objects>bad</objects>
<expression>perfect</expression>
<texture>perfect</texture>
<coloring>good</coloring>
<background>perfect</background>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:17 | 2 months ago | ox | 6274 tokens | $ 0.0026 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different dimensions. Be very critical.
Each of judgements should be one of three values:
* "poor" if the image does not match the description
* "good" if the image matches the description, but could be better
* "great" if there is nothing that could be improved about the image
Return the judgements in xml format. The xml should contain with the following field names:
<reasoning>
Step by step reasoning of why the image is good or not
</reasoning>
<style>
Is the character in the style specified? Is the fur pure white with a nice texture? Is the character friendly?
</style>
<task>
How well is the task being portrayed? Are all the items and actions present?
</task>
<quality>
What is the overall quality of the character? Are there any defects such as too many legs, eyes not open, etc?
</quality>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:33 | 2 months ago | ox | 8358 tokens | $ 0.0042 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different dimensions. Be very critical.
Each of judgements should be one of three values:
* "poor" if the image does not match the description
* "good" if the image matches the description, but could be better
* "great" if there is nothing that could be improved about the image
Return the judgements in xml format. The xml should contain with the following field names:
<reasoning>
Step by step reasoning of why the image is good or not
</reasoning>
<description>
Does the character match the description?
</description>
<task>
How well is the task being portrayed? Are all the items and actions present?
</task>
<quality>
What is the overall quality of the image?
</quality>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:16 | 2 months ago | ox | 5742 tokens | $ 0.0013 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different dimensions.
Return the judgements in xml format. The judgement should be either "poor", "good", or "great". The xml should contain with the following field names:
<reasoning>
Step by step reasoning of why the image is good or not
</reasoning>
<description>
Does the character match the description?
</description>
<task>
Is the character doing the task specified?
</task>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:17 | 2 months ago | ox | 5854 tokens | $ 0.0016 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different dimensions.
Return the judgements in xml format. The judgement should be either "poor", "good", or "great". The xml should contain with the following field names:
<reasoning>
Step by step reasoning of why the image is good or not
</reasoning>
<description>
Does the character match the description?
</description>
<task>
Is the character doing the task specified?
</task>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:36 | 2 months ago | ox | 2912 tokens | $ 0.0026 | |
Sample | Judge the following image on a few different dimensions.
Return the judgements in xml format. The judgement should be either "poor", "good", or "great". The xml should contain with the following field names:
<reasoning>
Step by step reasoning of why the image is good or not
</reasoning>
<description>
Does the character match the description?
</description>
<task>
Is the character doing the task specified?
</task>
Prompt:
{prompt}
Image:
{image}
Reason through your thoughts step by step before responding. Put your thoughts in the <reasoning></reasoning> tags. | 5 | image → text | Sample - N/A | completed | 00:00:00 | 2 months ago | ox | 0 tokens | $ 0.0000 |